Is thrombolytic therapy associated with increased mortality? Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
نویسندگان
چکیده
BACKGROUND Although thrombolytic therapy has shown substantial benefits in neural outcomes, concerns remain regarding the association between thrombolytic therapy and possible increased mortality. OBJECTIVE To determine the mortality risk of certain thrombolytic agents that are a treatment option for acute ischemic stroke. DATA SOURCES, EXTRACTION, AND SYNTHESIS Studies were identified using MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the reference lists of the articles selected. Randomized placebo-controlled trials of thrombolytic agents for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke patients were eligible. Study quality was evaluated using a previously validated scale. Data were extracted in duplicate by two independent investigators. All-cause mortality during follow-up was the main outcome. Random effects models were used to pool the individual effects of trials. Several preplanned sensitivity and subgroup analyses were completed to explain the heterogeneity among trials. Odds ratios, absolute risk differences, and numbers needed to harm were calculated. RESULTS Eleven placebo-controlled randomized trials of thrombolytic agents involving 3709 participants were included in the analysis. Thrombolytic therapy was associated with an insignificant increase in mortality (odds ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.8-1.39; P = .3). The treatment was associated with an absolute increased risk of mortality of 11 per 1000 persons (95% confidence interval, -24 to 48; P = .3), and the number needed to harm was 84 (the 95% confidence interval included 0). CONCLUSION These findings suggest that thrombolytic therapy does not significantly increase all-cause mortality.
منابع مشابه
Thrombolytic therapy of pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVES We sought to assess the efficacy and safety of thrombolytic therapy in patients with an acute pulmonary embolism (PE). BACKGROUND Thrombolytic therapy is approved for the treatment of acute PE; however, the safety and efficacy of this therapy remain debated. METHODS A meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials comparing thrombolytic agents with intravenous heparin in patients...
متن کاملSystemic thrombolytic therapy for acute pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis
AIM Thrombolytic therapy induces faster clot dissolution than anticoagulation in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) but is associated with an increased risk of haemorrhage. We reviewed the risks and benefits of thrombolytic therapy in the management of patients with acute PE. METHODS AND RESULTS We systematically reviewed randomized controlled studies comparing systemic thrombolytic ...
متن کاملThrombolysis versus anticoagulation for the initial treatment of moderate pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
BACKGROUND Randomized trials and meta-analyses have reached conflicting conclusions regarding the risk benefit ratio of thrombolytic therapy or anticoagulant therapy in patients with moderate pulmonary embolism. To investigate the effect of initial thrombolysis and anticoagulant therapy in patients with moderate pulmonary embolism, we performed an updated meta-analysis. METHODS We searched th...
متن کاملEfficacy of Prasaplai for Treatment of Primary Dysmenorrhea: a Meta-Analysis
Prasaplai is used in Thai traditional medicine for treatment of primary dysmenorrhea; however, clinical evidence is limited regarding the efficacy of Prasaplai for primary dysmenorrheal outcomes. This study has constituted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate Prasaplai as an effective treatment for primary dysmenorrhea. Randomized controlled trials were retrieved and identified thr...
متن کاملSafety outcomes in meta-analyses of phase 2 vs phase 3 randomized trials: Intracranial hemorrhage in trials of bolus thrombolytic therapy.
CONTEXT Recent studies have reported disagreement between meta-analysis of small trials and subsequent large trials addressing the same question. However, disagreement for uncommon but serious adverse safety outcomes has not been examined. OBJECTIVE To explore disagreement for serious adverse safety (intracranial hemorrhage [ICH]) and efficacy outcomes between meta-analysis of phase 2 (small)...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Archives of neurology
دوره 62 3 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2005